Find the Winning Candidate.
– Joseph Keppler Self-Portrait –
When I was in second grade, my father took me into lower
Manhattan on many Saturdays. We had a usual agenda: coffee and nut and spice
importers working out of warehouses on Chambers Street, where the World Trade
Center later stood, and didn’t. The Record Hunter, uptown, where he would
search for then-exotic European LPs of Baroque music. The main destination was
Book Store Row, streets south of Union Square where approximately 125 used-book
stores lived – cavernous, with balconies and bare light bulbs; or virtual
closets off the sidewalks, so small and narrow that they only sold short-story
collections, not novels. (No, but they were difficult to navigate if other
bibliophiles were there.)
I was barely able to read, but my love affair with books,
even the aroma of old paper, began on those Saturdays. Most of those shops are
gone now, and I have read where even the seven-miles-of-books Strand has been
squeezed by the pandemic and Mayor di Blasio’s choleric view of the economy.
A counterpart of Schulte’s, and Biblo and Tannen, and
Dauber and Pine, and other used-book stores of New York’s yesteryear, I
discovered in Paris. No surprise – the legendary Shakespeare and Company. It
was not the actual physical location of Sylvia Beach’s 1920s hangout of James
Joyce and Ernest Hemingway, but I think some of the dust was from that era.
My pied-a-terre in Paris, when not staying with
friends, is the centuries-old, tilted, somewhat aromatic, Hotel Esmeralda. It
is on the Seine but requires guests in certain rooms (like no. 16, remember)
to, appropriately, lean out the window and twist left in order to see the
magnificent Notre Dame. (Why “appropriately”? The Hunchback’s love interest was
Esmeralda, as you all know). But other rooms, if they have windows, look out
upon the back of the hotel, enclosed on four sides and dreary. But one of the
other sides is the back of Shakespeare and Company! Of course I knew I would
have to call the Esmeralda, even with creaky, winding stairs and one lone
breakfast table, my home – a great neighborhood.
(I would have put down roots at the Esmeralda anyway, as
two great cartooning friends – Hugo Pratt and Nicole Lambert – recommended the
place. A call from Hugo to Nestor would always somehow open up a room when
otherwise booked.)
What a tangent. Forgive me. A Crowded Life in Tangents,
I’m afraid.
I was talking about Book Store Row and my kidhood. Early
discoveries of my own, encouraged but not initiated by my father, were old
copies and volumes of Puck magazine. I have previously written here of
“meeting” Keppler, Opper, Zim, Gillam, Glackens, and so many great talents. I
also became acquainted with the great text humorists of the day, like Bill Nye.
Because Puck was also a political magazine, I
perforce became familiar with the issues and politicos of the day; the arcane
debates; as well as social manners and mores through panel cartoons and the
great ads.
Here, pertinence: on my first discovery of a stack of
1880s Pucks, dad let me buy one – an 1882 issue with an Opper center
spread, for a dollar. But another double-page cartoon in an 1880 issue caught
my eye, and has remained a relic of fascination.
It was by Joseph Keppler, the talented founder of Puck,
and appeared after the 1880 presidential election. The journal was a weekly,
but deadline exigencies prevented the creation of cartoon that could address
the campaign’s winner when the campaign was won (usually, of course).
What Keppler did – and I discovered when I assembled a
complete run of Puck – was indulge a peculiar talent he had. He had an
affinity for hiding faces in drawings. As much a puzzle-maker as a political
cartoonist at times, Keppler was to construct such cartoons several times
through the years. A realistic drawing, two realistic women representing the
parties, a realistic landscape. It was arboreal dell, with a grandmother’s
paisley shawl running through it.
The realism made it all the more challenging to embed
portraits and caricatures of a dozen politicians. But there they are… if you
can find them! Tree branches, rock formations, tangled bushes, all reveal the
shapes of the candidates Garfield and Hancock; running-mates, senators, mayors,
and crooks.
Why? To reveal the winning candidate, without revealing
the winning candidate. Readers of Puck that week engaged themselves in
checking lists and holding the magazine at all angles.
I became, through that cartoon, an even greater admirer of
Joseph Keppler than I ever would have been, if that were possible.
I was reminded of that summer afternoon on Book Store Row,
as an eight-year-old enthusiast; falling in love with Puck and Keppler
and vintage cartoons and American history and politics all at once. And
awestruck by the technical proficiency of a forgotten master.
... and of presidential campaigns too close to call.
It is bizarre that today, and in the hanging chads in
Florida of recent memory, our elections are more difficult to resolve; that
computers present challenges rather than facile solutions; that technology has
become our enemy (or the friend of cheaters).
Whenever you read this, the United States might have a 46th
president. Or maybe not. Another reason that I hold “progress’ to be a
faithless, teasing chimera.
Plus which, in those early days, the aroma of Yesterday’s
Papers was akin to perfume. Take that to the Electoral College.
–30–
106