Showing posts with label Thieves' Literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thieves' Literature. Show all posts

Friday, September 3, 2021

JACK SHEPPARD, PENNY GAFFS, AND JUVENILE DEPRAVITY –


— by John Adcock —♠


The amusements of these youths are the low theatres, the dancing saloons, and entertainments of a like description. Many of the penny theatres are frequented only by boys and girls who are already thieves and prostitutes. “Jack Sheppard,” “Dick Turpin,” “Claude Duval,” and other exhibitions of dexterous and daring crimes attract the attention and ambition of these boys, and each one endeavours to emulate the conduct of his favourite hero. An Inquiry into the Extents and Causes of Juvenile Depravity, Thomas Beggs, 3 Mar 1849

Thomas Begg’s inquiry into juvenile delinquency, and numerous other statistical inquiries undertaken throughout Britain by clergymen and missionaries, regarded destitute, homeless, juvenile boys and girls as heathens, lost in depravity, and in dire need of religion. “Heathenism is the poor man’s religion in the metropolis,” wrote R.W. Vanderkiste, a London City Missionary, in 1852. Vanderkiste took seriously his forays into Clerkenwell to save its children from “the heathen darkness.” Missionaries and Ragged School employees, armed with religious tracts, also targeted the slums of Spitalfields, Bethnal Green, and Whitechapel Road. Even the title to Vanderkiste’s travelogue sounds as foreboding as a trip to Darkest Africa; Notes and Narratives of a Six Year’s Mission, Principally Among the Dens of London. As to the efficacy of religious tracts G.W.M. Reynolds, in his Political Instructor, had this to say in 1850.

Those who talk so much about religious education, and deprecate secular education, have for many years been in the habit of circulating tracts, small pious stories about deathbed repentance, and such like, which tracts are seldom read. They contain no healthy nutriment for the minds of up-grown men, and are taken in and returned by the cottagers to the tract distributors as part of their duties. These tracts are seldom read, and when read are so silly and uninteresting, as to render a re-perusal impossible. Sir Harry Inglis and the sanctified Mr. Plumptre, as well as all pious rectors, curates, and others who feel an interest in such matters, may rest assured that such religious teaching is a waste of time and money, and that it would be of service to the state that their pious intentions received a more healthy direction.[i]

Reynolds, at least, proposed more useful ways to combat poverty — in his opinion secular education and a fair day’s wages for a fair day’s work were preferable to pious homilies. The Chartists maintained that “to secure to labour all its just reward, is to increase in the same proportion the ability to purchase, and to lessen the weight of pauperism and crime.” Walter Cooper, on behalf of the Associative Tailors, addressed their brother toilers of all trades in 1850. “You will not pay living wages? Look to see your poor rates increase, and your streets swarm with prostitutes and beggars!” Reynolds did not romanticize the lower classes in his novels but he understood their vice, criminality, and degradation as the inevitable result of extreme poverty. To Reynolds the law was a system designed for the rich, intended to keep down the poor. Justice was a façade. As for the poor, it was their own damned fault.[ii]

And this is the prospect for the poor of England who live in great towns and cities. Prospect! did we say? It is the actual reality. It is here where the impulses which all men and women – even the worst of them – to do good, if it be but for once in the course of a feverish life, are strangled! It is here that honesty goes forth shame-stricken, and bold, brazen dishonesty flaunts it and is applauded. It is in these terrible lazar spots that the pure are polluted and the chaste are compelled to sell their innocence for bread! It is from homes skulking in the forbidden corners in these localities that mothers come forth and sell their bodies in order that their children shall live, and hence it is that the widows of labourers and artisans are forced to surrender every vestige of matronly dignity, to traverse the streets with drunken and delirious steps, and maddened with the remorse of a crime for which they should surely remain guiltless (…)[iii]

The selling of children for sex was rife in the slums. One prostitute related her story to Henry Mayhew for a series of articles in the Morning Chronicle. She was an orphan who could neither read nor write, placed in a small tradesman’s family, where her mistress beat her black and blue with hands and sticks. She ran away and took up residence in low penny or two penny lodging-houses filled with children. “During this time, I used to see boys and girls from ten to twelve years old sleeping together (…) I saw things between almost children that I cannot describe to you – very often I saw them and that shocked me.” At twelve she lived with a fifteen-year-old boy as husband and wife. She soon turned to prostitution. She described accommodations in a low lodging-house in Kent Street where no adults were present.

They were all thieves and bad girls. I have known between three or four dozen boys and girls sleep in one room. The beds were horrid filthy and full of vermin. There was very wicked carryings on. The boys, if any difference, was the worst. We lay packed on a full night, a dozen boys and girls squeezed into one bed. That was very often the case – some at the foot and some at the top – boys and girls all mixed. I can’t go into all the particulars, but whatever could take place in words or acts between boys and girls did take place, and in the midst of the others. I am sorry to say that I took part in these bad ways myself, but I wasn’t so bad as all the others. There was only a candle burning all night, but in summer it was light a great part of the night. Some boys and girls slept without any clothes, and would dance about the room that way. I have seen two dozen capering about the room that way; some mere children – the boys generally the youngest.

The boys in the lodging-house sent the girls out on the streets to engage in prostitution. If this proved unsuccessful the girls would steal something rather than return empty-handed and face a brutal beating.

I have seen them beaten, often kicked and beaten until they were blind from bloodshot, and their teeth knocked out with kicks from boots as the girl lays upon the ground. The boys, in their turn, are out thieving all day, and the lodging-house keeper will buy any stolen provisions of them, and sell them to the lodgers.[iv]

As early as 1841 the Sixth Report of the Inspector of Prisons in England found that a “vast number of boy malefactors, when examined, were found to have been misled by witnessing the performance of such plays as Jack Sheppard.” Chamber’s Edinburgh Journal covered the report under the title Felon Literature and quotes numerous boy’s testimony to their influence. An eighteen-year-old said “I have seen Jack Sheppard performed; I thought he was a capital example for those who followed the trade.” A fourteen-year-old thought Jack Sheppard was “very nice, and if I was only as clever I would be thought the very best of thieves.” Another; “I had his life, some boy took it from me; most boys have his life.” A twenty-one-year-old said “(…) I noticed them picking one another’s pockets on the stage; it gave everyone a great insight how to do it. If I did not know how to do such tricks when I went into the theatre, I am sure I could when I came out.”

One eighteen-year-old identified as J. H. had just entered the fifth year of his apprenticeship when he came across a “Life” of Jack Sheppard. He then saw the play, probably in a penny gaff. It “excited in my mind an inclination to imitate him; the part was well acted at the play. I read how he got into places; and I had a wish to try if I could do the same. The play made the greatest impression on my mind. A few weeks after I saw the play, I committed the first robbery. When the scene is hoisted, he is carving his name upon a beam which goes across the shop. I wrote ‘Jack Sheppard’ on the shop-beam, just as it was in the play. It occurred to my mind that this trade was like my own –  a carpenter. I often thought about it when I was at work.”

There is no reason to doubt the boy’s testimony. On the other hand, James Greenwood, “The Amateur Casual,” writing in 1869 in The Seven Curses of London, cautions against taking juvenile prisoner’s tales at face value. “A talent for gammoning “Lady Green,” as the prison chaplain is irreverently styled, is highly appreciated among the thieving fraternity.” Greenwood toured the boys’ wing of the gaol with a governor known by the boys to blame penny dreadfuls for their pernicious influence. All boys when asked would say “It was them there penny numbers what I used to take in, sir,” and receive a pat on the head and a homily for his troubles. Considering the terrible lives they led boys really had no reason to blame the penny dreadfuls. The Bee-Hive, a working man’s newspaper reported the following sad story in 1870.

BOW-STREET. James Anderson, a ragged little urchin, of about eight years of age, was charged with stealing money from a till. A corn chandler disposed that he saw the prisoner crawl into his shop and creep behind the counter. He put his hand into the till and went out of the shop. Prosecutor followed, and ultimately captured the prisoner, who by this time had thrown the money away. Prosecutor lost altogether about four shillings. Some of the money was picked up by the boys in the street. – The father of the prisoner here stepped forward, and said that his boy had become corrupted by bad companions amongst whom he had fallen, and who frequently enticed him into a “Penny Gaff” in the Euston-Road. The money was doubtless stolen on purpose to visit that place. He (the father) had often beaten his boy with a strap for going to the place, which was the resort of thieves and bad girls. – Mr. Vaughan said, that a similar case to the one now before him, the “Penny Gaff” in the Euston-Road, had been alluded to. He should request Mr. Balding (the inspector on duty at the court), to report the frequent complaints that had been made concerning the latter place to the Chief Commissioner of Police immediately. – Mr. Vaughan (to the prisoner): Who told you to go to that place? – The prisoner: No one, Sir, I went with another boy, a cripple. I have been there about six times. – Mr. Vaughan: Were there many people there when you went? – The prisoner: Yes, Sir, it was always crowded. –  Mr. Vaughan: And what do you see there, little boy? –The prisoner: “Oh, they give us about three songs; then there’s some actin’, then they puts down the blind, and that’s all you see.” (Laughter.) – Mr. Vaughan: What kind of acting was it? – The prisoner: Eh? – Mr. Vaughan: What kind of acting was it?  –The prisoner: Oh; murdering and that. – Mr. Vaughan at this stage remanded the prisoner for a week.

It seems that penny bloods and penny dramas did encourage the homeless, impoverished, and children of the honest working classes to crime. The sensational texts provided would-be boy-burglars, boy-pirates, and boy highwaymen with the appropriate chap-book heroes to emulate. Oscar Wilde said “The boy-burglar is simply the inevitable result of life’s imitative instinct. He is Fact, occupied as Fact usually is, with trying to reproduce Fiction, and what we see in him is repeated on an extended scale throughout the whole of life.”[v] 

Poverty, drink and fractured family life were a more direct cause of juvenile crime. A report in The Times of December 30, 1847 is a startling example of the fatalistic attitudes carried about London by neglected children:

Mansion House. – A boy of about twelve years of age named William Lipley, was brought before the Lord mayor on the charge of stealing a piece of beef. From the statement of the officer it appeared that the prisoner belonged to a most dangerous gang of little boys, who were very much practised in robbing women in Bishopsgate-street and Leadenhall-market, and whose diminutive size gave them facilities unknown to children of larger growth. The charge was proved.


The Lord Mayor.  – Do you say that this boy is an old hand at thieving?


The Officer. – Certainly, my lord. He has been often in custody. When I caught him, I asked him where he supposed he should at last get to?


“Go to,” said he, “why to the gallows, to be sure.”


The Lord Mayor. – Did you say so, prisoner?


The Boy. – Yes; the man’s right enough. I did say so.

The prisoner was then committed to trial.

The strongest street Arabs tormented the weakest — small children, drunks, cripples, and imbeciles. One tiny girl was arrested carrying a baby which she had been tormenting by cutting its flesh with a blade, a pitiful public cry for help. Accidents, fires, and public hangings attracted riotous mobs of swearing children of “tender years.” The publisher Charles Gilpin spoke to a group engaged in lewd, obscene, and filthy conversation outside the Debtor’s door. The juveniles had spent the night in the street to secure a good view of the morning’s hanging. Young people were “children in years, but old in vice profligacy and debauchery.” Mr. Roberts of Bristol visited 167 prisoners awaiting sentence of death, of that number he claimed 165 had attended previous executions.

Not only the children. G. W. M. Reynolds wrote in his Political Instructor, under the heading A LESSON FOR THE PEOPLE,[vi] “Then what of the aristocracy? Why, at the public strangulation of the Mannings, there were present numerous scions of that oligarchical class. One “noble lord” paid ten guineas for a seat and drove down in his cab at six o’clock on the fatal morning, alighting in great Suffolk-street and repairing on foot to the house where “a window” was reserved for his special behoof (…) “gentlemen of fashion” were as plentiful on the occasion as ‘gentleman of the swell mob.”[vii]



[i] Reynoldss Political Instructor, Vol 1, No. 20, March 23, 1850, p.159

[ii] Reynoldss Political Instructor, Vol 1, No. 21, March 30, 1850, p.168

[iii] The Rookeries, Reynoldss Political Instructor, Vol 1, No. 21, March 30, 1850, p.162

[iv] The Confessions of an Unfortunate Girl, Reynoldss Political Instructor, Vol 1, No. 16, February 23, 1850, p.122

[v] The Decay of Lying, Oscar Wilde, The Nineteenth Century, January 1889

[vi] Dec 8, 1849

[vii] In Dec 1849 The Trial of the Mannings, with their portraits was published, price three pence, but you must ask for Lloyds Edition, as all the other editions are not sold under sixpence.

Top of the page image is from The Street Waif by E. Harcourt Burrage, woodcut illustration by Harry Maguire, c.1884


Thursday, August 5, 2021

Early London Detective Fiction and Police News

 

by John Adcock

The Victorian era detective story began with the publication in the April 1841 issue of Graham's Magazine of Edgar Allan Poe’s The Murders in the Rue Morgue which gave the author a Parisian reputation.Poe’s popular volume Tales of the Grotesque spread the story throughout Europe. Dickens introduced the first private eye in English literature in 1843, Mr. Nadgett, in Martin Chuzzlewit. Angus B. Reach featured a detective as a character in Clement Lorimer: or, The Book with the Iron Clasps: A Romance, published by D. Bogue in 1849 with illustrations by George Cruikshank. Dickens Bleak House, first published as a serial between March 1852 and September 1853, marked the arrival of the first police procedural hero, as well as the first calling together of all the suspects in a murder for the unravelling of a crime. [Bill Blackbeard in a post on the now defunct Yahoo group Bloods & Dime Novels.]

Charles Dickens was the first author to experiment with monthly instalments of his three-volume novels, and the first to begin issuing weekly instalments in All the Year Round. On April 30, 1859, A Tale of Two Cities, In Three Books, commenced serialization in All the Year Round. The Woman in White, “a continuous original work of fiction” by Wilkie Collins began serialization in All the Year Round on Nov 23, 1859. Great Expectations was announced on November 3, 1860, it was “to be continued from week to week until completed in about eight months.”  The Times review of Great Expectations labelled these weekly instalments “a great experiment”

The first of these fictions which achieved a decided success was that of Mr. Wilkie Collins — The Woman in White. It was read with avidity by hosts of weekly readers, and the momentum which it acquired when published in fragments carried it through several large editions when published as a whole.[i]

Dickens and Collins successes with sensational serials in literary magazines, usually connected with penny and halfpenny journals, led to sensation novels, books and serials calculated to entice a market on the move. Railway libraries, cheap books such as The Travellers’ Library, The Parlour Library, and The Popular Library, came into being in the 1850s to satisfy the demand for light railway reading. Men, women and children bought reading material to leaf through on long train rides, or when waiting in line for admittance to restaurants and clubs. Continuous serials attracted a traveling audience and so were designed to build a weekly readership. The Times, again…

Lingering over the delineation of character and of manners, our novelists began to lose sight of the story and to avoid action. Periodical publication compelled them to a different course. They could not afford, like Scheherazade, to let the devourers of their tales go to sleep at the end of a chapter. As modern stories are intended not to set people to sleep, but to keep them awake, instead of the narrative breaking down into a soporific dullness, it was necessary that it should rise at the close into startling incident.

Fictional detectives began surfacing in yellow backs for railway reading in the 1860s. Recollections of a Detective Police Officer by “Waters” (William Russell) was the earliest of these detective fictions, first appearing in Chambers’s Edinburgh Journal in 1849. It was then published between covers by J. & C. Brown in 1856, Kent in 1857,[iii] and finally by Charles H. Clarke on Dec 15, 1859. This was followed on October 16, 1860 by A Skeleton in Every House, More Mysteries by Waters, in Clarke’s The Parlour Library series whose copyright had been purchased in January from Darton & Co. The next was Tom Fox; or, The Revelations of a Detective, “Comprising Adventures, Disguises, Perils, Escapes, Captures, and Intrigues.” This was issued April 1860 by George Vickers with 158 engravings.

The author of Tom Fox; or, The Revelations of a Detective was John Bennett. Bennett published his first work, Night and Day; or, Better Late than Never in 1858. In 1860 Bennett wrote The Career of an Artful Dodger; his Art and Artfulness for George Vickers. One of his serials about a London street boy was issued in penny numbers by Henry Vickers as The Life and Career of a London Errand Boy

By 1873, three companies were named in an article on cheap literature as purveyors of the “largest proportion of criminal literature of the present time.” Those were The Newsagents’ Publishing Co., Edward Harrison and Henry Vickers. 

The author of the uncomplimentary article identifies the author of The Life and Career of a London Errand Boy, John Bennett, as the “Editor of the Police Record.”[iv] He was probably referring to The Illustrated Police News, Law Courts and Criminal-Record, begun Feb. 20, 1864, which ran to 3862 numbers, ending on Mar 3, 1938. The first publisher was John Ransom and the owners were Lee and Bulpin. It has been suggested that this was Henry Lea and Edwin Bulpin.[v] The Publisher’s Circular told the facts on April 15, 1868.

A curious instance of the vicissitudes attending literary property is given in the Press News of the current month, in the case of the Illustrated Police News, which was originally projected and started by a small machine-printer in London, who, getting into financial difficulties soon after, had to arrange with his creditors, and the publication in question, which was just beginning to pay, was sold out and out for £150.

George Purkess junior had published Purkess’s Penny Library of Romances in January 1863. He was named as proprietor and publisher of the Illustrated Police News in November 1865[vi] and the Illustrated Police Gazette on Feb. 9, 1867. In 1871 he published the Halfpenny Police Gazette; or, London by Gaslight, which was incorporated into the Illustrated Police News after the sixth number. A dubious character named Edward Henri Todé was identified on September 24, 1869 as the editor and publisher of the Illustrated Police News by The English Mechanic, who had previously employed him as an editor. 

If Todé had any connection at all to the Illustrated Police News it was as a one-time editor. The periodical also claimed Todé was the editor of The New Newgate Calendar, a penny dreadful which was serialized by Edward Harrison from 1863 to 1865. In 1870 The English Mechanic wrote that Todé “was no more the creator of this publication than an empty coal barge on the Thames creates the tides on which it rides.” 

Palmer’s Index to “The Times” Newspaper for 1872 shows an inquest had taken place on the body of Edward Henri Todé “who Died of a Fit on the Streets” on May 26 of that year.

JKA



[i] Times, October 17, 1861

[ii] On the Sensational in Literature and Art, G.A. Sala, Belgravia, Vol.4, 1867/68, p.445

[iii] Catalog of an Exhibition arranged to illustrate New Paths in Book-Collecting, Nov 1934, p.33

[iv] Cheap Literature Past and Present, John Pownall Harrison, The British Almanac of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, 1873, p.60

[v] Cruel Deeds and Dreadful Calamities:  The Illustrated Police News, 1864-1938, Linda Stratmann

[vi] Pennies, Profits and Poverty, Robert J. Kirkpatrick, 2016, P.69

[vii] Cheap Literature Past and Present, The British Almanac 1873, p.78

[viii] Sensational Literature, The Reader, Nov. 12, 1864. P.597


Friday, January 1, 2021

FAST WOMEN OF LONDON,

ANONYMA, AND THE LADY DETECTIVES


Anonyma image above from Palace and Hovel: or, Phases of London Life 

by Daniel Joseph Kirwan, 1870. 


by John Adcock

(excerpt from Thieves Literature)

“(…) it was not long before she had disencumbered herself of all these ugly impediments, and stood in the ruddy glow and genial warmth, adorned only by her own loveliness –  but then, you know my heroine throughout has always been such a shocking slut.” – Fanny White and her Friend Jack Rawlings [1]

On August 9, 1863 The Women of London, A Thrilling Romance of Reality, giving an Insight into the Dangers and Temptations of a Woman’s Life in London was issued from the “Welcome Guest” Office, 4 Shoe-lane. Possibly the same work with a slightly different title, The Women of London Disclosing the Trials and Temptations of a Woman's Life in London With Occasional Glimpses of a Fast Career issued in penny numbers from George Vickers. 

One of the first prosecutions of the Society for the Prevention of Vice under the Obscene Publications Act of 1857, also known as Lord Campbell's Act, was of William Strange for an “obscene” publication called Women of London. On May 11, 1857, Strange, “who was a very respectable looking young man,” was sentenced to three months in prison but spared hard labour.

The title Women of London became notorious and was kept in print throughout the sixties and seventies from a variety of publishers. Likely the Vickers and Welcome Guest publications were different from those sold by pornographers Charles Perry and William Dugdale. William Strange and George Vickers had been associated with cheap literature all their lives, the fathers of both young publishers were among the radical unstamped pressmen of the 1830s and were acquaintances and neighbours of Holywell-street pornographer and Regency veteran William Dugdale.

William Strange Sr. had published an unstamped newspaper, Truth, and was one of many publishers of an obscene anti-Papist work, The Confessional Unmasked. George Vickers was responsible for the racy 1850 romance, The Merry Wives of London a Romance of Metropolitan Life, attributed to James Lindridge. The Reverend Jasper Sampson meets a lady at a ball and is thrown into a state of “intense fluttering.”

“Am I in godly company?” she whispered to him.

“The sons and daughters of Satan do abound here; but presently we will slay them with the sword of Gideon!” replied Jasper, giving her hand a palpable squeeze.

“Is it sinful to dance?”

“No; or else it were sinful to lie with a man.”

“Fie! That is natural!”

“Quite; and proper, too, when the parties are agreeable. The world must be populated, madam.”

“Verily it must; it was the law given to Abraham.”

“The wages of continence are death.”

“I feel it to be so. Would that we could pray!”

“On your back, madam – very proper wish; but not allowed here.”

One of the characters is a Bow Street Runner named Mr. Johnson, “a lean, but muscular fellow, with an eye as furtive as the ape’s, and as keen as the hawks.” His help is enlisted in finding and rescuing a disappeared young lady named Lucy.

“All right!” said the detective, plunging into a great coat, with large pockets, containing handcuffs, pistols, loaded and primed, and other etceteras of his agreeable profession. “Don’t talk here – plenty of time on the road,” said he, gulping down his brandy-and-water. “I know all about it. Special engine of course?”

“Certainly,” replied Walter, delighted with his new companions cool, prompt manner.

The Women of London was followed in 1864 by a spate of similar risqué penny numbers. The Work Girls of London; their Trials and Temptations and The Young Ladies of London; or, The Mysteries of Midnight issued forth from the Newsagents’ Publishing Company. The Outsiders of Society; or, the Wild Beauties of London and The Dashing Girls of London; or, The Six Beauties of St. James were published by Henry Lea on November 20, 1864. 

Young Ladies of London; or Night Scenes in the Haymarket was published by Lea in December 1864. The cover to the first number of The Outsiders of Society is illuminated with a woodcut captioned His Lordship Contemplates his Victim. Lord Vineyard is shown in the shadows, hunched over, and reaching furtively into his vest pocket. Before his predatory gaze, under a guttering candle, is a dying woman, whose child’s pale blonde face is the focus of the picture. This class of publication, recalling Reynolds’s Mysteries of London, usually pretended a social concern for the poor that did not match their mildly prurient content. 

The first publishing of Anonyma; or, Fair but Frail, A Romance of West-End Life, Manners, and “Captivating” People was in 1863, issued by George Vickers. The novel was “as vile a contribution to our blackguard literature as we have ever recorded in our monthly list of new books,” opined The Bookseller on September 30, 1863. In real-life Anonyma, also known as “Skittles,” was Catherine Walters, a fashionable member of the demi-monde born at Liverpool in 1839. She became famous in 1862 when she could be seen driving a pair of “the handsomest brown ponies eyes ever beheld” in Hyde Park. The “pretty horse-breaker” became notorious, so much so that West End shopkeepers displayed her photographed carte de visite in their windows.

When she ran off to America with a married nobleman named Aubrey de Vere Beauclerk, in January 1863, her house was opened to the public, who viewed her bedroom, “a mass of huge looking-glasses, blue silk and white and gold,” and sniggered over her meagre library containing The Royal Blue Book from 1858 to 1862, Dod’s Peerage, Who’s Who, Dunbar on Park Riding and a racing calendar.  It was reported in June 1864 that “After a sensational review which appeared of a shilling biography called Anonyma, 40,000 copies of the book were sold, and this the publisher attributes to the review.” An 1864 review of Anonyma and its successor Skittles a Biography of a Fascinating Woman found them “not a whit inferior in style, language, ability, or morality” to any current novels finding their way into the libraries of decent families.

Anonyma is rather sentimental. Skittles is outspoken and cynical, with a dash of humour. In Skittles the subject is treated somewhat in the manner of Fielding, while Anonyma might have been written by a rather rowdy Richardson.[2]

The reviewer for The Athenaeum held a different view of what he termed “Anonyma Literature,” issued in “yellow covers, with gaudy illustrations, which professes to tell the histories of certain infamous women,” concluding “no respectable bookseller would like his daughter to read such books, and no man who values his repute should suffer them to disgrace his shop.” 

Anonyma’s success birthed numerous similar tiles (as listed by the reviewer): Skittles, a Biography of a Fascinating Woman, Companion to Anonyma; Agnes Willoughby, a Tale of Love, Marriage and Adventure; Kate Hamilton, an Autobiography of a Gay Life and a “Love” Career; Left Her Home, a Tale of Adventure, in which the Fortunes and Misfortunes of a Charming Girl are Narrated; Incognita, a Tale of Love and Passion; Annie, or the Life of a Lady’s Maid, comprising a full Description of all the Curious Occurrences, Intrigues, Amours and Expedients of Fashionable Gay Life amidst the Aristocracy, and Revelations of a Detective. All these publications were published in “gaudy covers” and sold openly at railway stations.[3]

In the text of Ruth the Betrayer; or, The Female Spy, by Edward Ellis (February 8, 1862) the homicidal heroine is described as a detective but the word is used loosely to denote what Ruth is, in fact, a police informer. Ruth is “attached to a notorious Secret Intelligence Office, established by an ex-member of the police force, and her services were only rarely employed, as upon the present occasion, in connexion with the regular police.” In addition to her work as a police spy Ruth runs a bordello and shoots, stabs, and hacks to death any man who has the misfortune to cross her.

There was an indescribable something about this woman’s manner, degraded though she was by the hateful calling which she followed of spy and informer, that seemed sufficiently powerful to curb the tongue of the roughest, coarsest, and most lawless, and effectually to check any attempt at familiarity from those persons who might have thought that her temporary association with them, in moments like the present, placed them upon a footing of equality.

Tinsley Brothers would publish a more conventional 3-volume detective story by C.H. Ross in 1870 called A Private Inquiry. The hero is a converted thief turned amateur detective. The headline to the Spectator’s review (Oct. 15, 1870) read A “PENNY DREADFUL” IN THREE VOLUMES. A reviewer in The Athenaeum said, “It’s style and price forbid the supposition that it has been written for that portion of the poorer classes who revel in the penny horrors of cheap periodical literature, yet it is sad to think that any who could afford more wholesome reading should waste their time in the perusal of such gloomy rubbish.”

On May 15, 1864, The Revelations of a Lady Detective, a yellowback by the author of “Skittles” (William Stephens Hayward), was advertised in Lloyd’s newspaper, issued by J. A. Berger of 13 Catherine Street, Strand. There would seem to be some sort of relationship between J.A. Berger and E. Griffiths who shared the same premises. The same work (both advertisements listed the same contents) was in the hands of George Vickers, Angel-court, Strand on Oct 2, 1864. The Female Detective, edited by Andrew Forrester Jr (J. Redding Ware), “never before published,” was advertised in Reynolds's Newspaper on May 22, 1864 from Ward & Lock.[4] 

A latecomer to the genre, In the Shadows of Crime, Romantic Revelations of a Lady Detective, by R. J. Tucknor, was serialized December 8, 1894 in the Illustrated Police News.




[1] Fanny White and Her Friend Jack Rawlings A Romance Of A Young Lady Thief and a Boy Burglar Including Their Artful Dodges; Their Struggles and Adventures; Prisons and Prison-breakings; Their Ups and Downs; and Their Tricks Upon Travellers, Etc., Etc., by the author of Charlie Wag, George Vickers, Aug 8, 1863

[2] The Saturday Review, Feb 6, 1864, p.171, 172

[3] The Athenaeum, No. 1930, October 22, 1864, p.523


Sunday, March 22, 2020


Thieves’ Literature: Three centuries of Penny Bloods, Sensational Literature & Popular Melodrama — Chapter 1


Portrait of Moll Cut-Purse, "Female Humerrist and Kickshaw messe," from a 1793 book. She was an active criminal in 1610. She was infamous as a pipe-smoking prostitute and procuress, a fortune-teller, a pick-pocket, a thief, and a receiver of stolen goods, who dressed and acted like a man.

— by John Adcock —♠


I.

LAST DYING SPEECHES, BOG-HOUSE MISCELLANIES, AND BLAZING STARS

The condition of an Author, is much like that of a Strumpet (…) and if Reason be required, Why we betake ourselves to so Scandalous a Profession as Whoring or Pamphleteering, the same exclusive Answer will serve us both, viz. That the unhappy circumstances of a Narrow Fortune, hath forc’d us to do that for our Subsistence, which we are much asham’d of. A Trip to Jamaica, Ned Ward, 1698

The records of the Old Bailey and the Accounts of the Ordinary of Newgate, which contain the “great criminal history of England,” had a lasting influence on English literature.  The influence of the Accounts can be found in the works of Daniel Defoe, John Gay, Henry Fielding, and the visual novelist William Hogarth. In the nineteenth century, the Newgate Accounts supplied the plots of innumerable works of literature in 3-volume novels and penny parts, as well as in the fierce melodramas of the popular stage. In a fascinating book, Ernest Bernbaum suggested that the origins of the British novel could be found in the criminal biographies of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.[1]

Criminal literature in England began with the Ordinary of Newgate, the chaplain of Newgate prison, who recorded the confessions of the condemned and was given free license to publish accounts of prisoner’s lives, crimes and last dying speeches. Single broadsheets sold at prices varying between three and six pence. Over time the format changed from single broadsheets to six, and finally twenty-eight-page pamphlets.[2] 

Occasionally felons refused to confess to the Ordinary and arranged publication through private printers. Opportunistic publishers rushed into print their own, mostly fabulous, last dying confessions in cheap broadsheet, pamphlet, or ballad form. Hawkers sold these penny sheets to crowds directly under the scaffold on hanging day, oftentimes before the Ordinary’s accounts were available.[3] 

Long-winded titles of dying speeches were bawled through the streets of London and its suburbs. The day after John Rice was hung for forgery in 1763, as the hawkers of broadsides and ballads made their perambulations, the good people of Newington “gave the poor people money not to cry the speeches near her (Rice’s mother’s) house.”[4]

Criminal biographies of men and women were published throughout the seventeenth century but the earliest extant example of “highwayman literature” dated back to 1605. A pamphlet was published shortly after Elizabethan highwayman Gamaliel Ratsey’s execution and entered on the books of the Stationers Company on May 2, 1605 by “the celebrated ballad-bookseller John Trundle.” It contained The Life and death of Gamaliel Ratsey, a famous theefe of England, executed at Bedford the 26. of March last past, 1605, and a poem titled Ratseis Ghost, or, the second Part of his madde Prankes and Robberies. This was printed by V.S. to be sold by John Hodgets in Paules Church-yard. The inside first page of the second part corrected the title to “Ratsey’s Ghost.” 

There were two contemporary ballads, or “ballets,” as well — songs of praise to Gamaliel Ratsey. George Steevens, commenting on Shakespeare’s plays, mentions once having in his possession “a pamphlet containing his (Ratsey’s) life and exploits. In the title-page of it he is represented with this ugly vizor on his face.”

Thomas Frognall Dibdin wrote that “Ratsey appears to have been a mad, harum-scarum fellow—in drinking, thieving, and cheating, &c.; having two comrades, of like propensities, in Snell and Shorthose.”[5] Gamaliel, as his biographer painted him, was a light-hearted, theatrical gentleman highwayman (sometimes called highway-lawyers), who, it was claimed, wore a hideous feathered owl-mask to terrify his victims into compliance. 

Ratsey’s legend passed into the nineteenth century when similar characters turned up in penny numbers in Newgate, a Romance (1846), Blueskin: A Romance of the Last Century (1863), Tales of Highwaymen; or, Life on the Road (1865), and Owlet the Robber Prince; or, the Unknown Highwayman (1871). The Life and death of Gamaliel Ratsey was reprinted in Collier’s Green Series No. 18, sold by subscription, on March 1866, with an introduction by the antiquarian John Payne Collier.

Fifty years after Ratsey’s hanging a highway-woman called Jenny Fox was riding on the King’s highways waylaying night-coaches by moonlight. She was the subject of The Highway-Woman; or, a True and Perfect Narrative of the Wicked Life and Deplorable Death of Marcy Clay, Otherwise called Jenny Fox, Who being Condemned to be Hanged, with other Malefactors, at Tyburn, on Wednesday, the 12th of April, Instant, did on the Tuesday fore-going, Poyson herself, to avoid the Shame of that kind of Death. The Highway-Woman was printed by T.L. in 1665, and went through several editions. A portrait of Jenny Fox was sold separately. 

Fox was the daughter of a chapman and his wife, who followed the fairs around the kingdom selling their stock of books. At fifteen she went to London and became a practiced shoplifter, as an adult she took on highway-robbery, switching between male and female attire to remain undetected. One evening, well mounted and in men’s apparel, she met a man with his sword drawn and a pistol in his hand, crying Deliver, Deliver, as he approached her.

She being well acquainted with that language, though she knew not him, drew her sword, saying, If thou canst beat me, take all I am worth: Whereupon discharging their pistols at each other, without much hurt on either side, they both handling their swords, fell fiercely to it; but the Captain being somewhat in drink before he met her, and receiving a violent blow on his hand, tumbled to the ground: whereupon she alighted, and only took from him one half of what he had in his pocket ( …) Whereupon, with an undaunted spirit, she invited him to drink with her, and made herself known to him, and continued with him, as a half-sharer, for the space of two Months, because he was better acquainted with the Road, than she was: during which time, there was many Robberies committed, but no Hue and Crys could ever overtake them.[6]

A book was registered in the Stationers’ registers in 1610 called The Mad Prankes of Mery Mall of the Bankside, with her Walkes in Mans Apparill and to what purpose, written by John Day. This “notorious baggage” was the subject of a play by Middleton and Dekker called The Roaring Girle, Or Moll Cut-Purse, acted onstage at The Fortune in 1611. The frontispiece to the latter “contains a full length of her in man’s clothes, smoking tobacco.”[7] A writer in the Universal Magazine of Knowledge wrote in 1775 that it was at that time “almost as rare a sight to see a woman with a pipe as to see one of the sex in male apparel.”

Mary Frith, or Moll Cut-Purse, a woman of a masculine spirit and make, who was commonly supposed to have been a hermaphrodite, practised, or was instrumental to, almost every crime, and wild frolick, which is notorious in the most abandoned, and eccentric of both sexes. She was infamous as a prostitute and procuress, a fortune-teller, a pick-pocket, a thief, and a receiver of stolen goods; she was also concerned with a dexterous scribe in forging hands. Her most signal exploit was robbing General Fairfax, upon Hounslow Heath, for which she was sent to Newgate; but was, by the proper application of a large sum of money, soon set at liberty.[8]

The year 1621, in the reign of Charles the First, a work was published which novelist Henry Fielding, writing in The History of the Life of the Late Mr. Jonathan Wild the Great, called “that excellent book.” John Reynolds, a merchant of Exeter, was the author of The Triumphs of God’s Revenge against the Crying and Execrable Sin of Murder. “There were five subsequent parts; all six were printed together in folio in 1635; and there was a reprint, with additions, in 1679.”[9]  

The 1679 edition was published by J. Bennett for Thomas Lee, and was the first to add the portion God’s Revenge Against Adultery, by Sam. Pordage, to the text. Reynolds wrote another title on the same subject in 1661, with Blood for Blood, or Murthers Revenged; to which are added K. Charles the Martyr, &c. by T.M.

Of all the volumes, those of popular entertainment are soonest injured. It would be difficult to find four folios that are oftener found in dirty and mutilated condition than this first assemblage of Shakespeare’s Plays, God’s Revenge against Murder, the Gentleman’s Recreation, and Johnson’s Lives of the Highwayman.[10]

Over many years the title was passed from publisher to publisher. The editions printed by Sarah Griffin for William Lee, “sold at this Shop in Fleet-street, at the sign of the Turks-Head, near the Mitre-Tavern,” began in 1656, retitled God's Revenge for Murder, The Triumphs of God's Revenge Against the Crying and Execrable Sin of Murther, Expressed in thirty several Tragicall Histories (digested into Six Books) which contain great variety of mournful and memorable Accidents, Amorous, Moral, and Divine. The third edition (1657), the first with plates, bore an “engraved title-page by Io: Payne, in compartments, depicting a hanging, execution, breaking on the wheel, burning, duel, etc., and upwards of 30 further engravings in compartments at the head of each history, representing murders, duels, etc. (…) whereunto are added the lively Pourtraictures of the several persons, etc.” 

Charles Lamb owned a copy of the third edition with handwritten notes by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. These Griffin/Lee editions survived to posterity in large quantity, probably due to the popularity of its lurid illustrations. A critic of fine art described them in 1838 as “of the lowest grade (…) and at the same time prove the public taste to have been at a very low ebb.”[11]

The illustrations might have been inspired by the seminal sensational work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs. The first folio edition was originally published in 1563 bearing the title Acts and Monuments of these Latter and Perilous Days &c. by John Foxe. It was chiefly remembered for the copious illustrated editions, some with as many as 150 horrific cuts. Dickens had his character David Copperfield sit mesmerized over a large quarto edition of Foxe’s Book of Martyrs found in Peggotty’s house. “This precious volume, of which I do not recollect one word, I immediately discovered and immediately applied myself to; and I never visited the house afterwards, but I kneeled on a chair, opened the casket where this gem was enshrined, spread my arms over the desk, and fell to devouring the book afresh. I was chiefly edified, I am afraid, by the pictures, which were numerous, and represented all kinds of dismal horrors.”

The popularity and influence of God’s Revenge against Murder, with its horrific pictures, was enormous. There were editions in 1621, 1635, 1656, 1657, 1667, 1670, 1679, 1704, 1753 and 1778. A Dutch translation, Tonneel der Wereldtse Rampsaligheden vertoonende Godts Wraake, was published in Amsterdam by G. Van Goedesburgh in 1677, each copperplate engraving showing eight scenes. God’s Revenge Against Murder and Adultery was serialized in John Wesley’s Arminian Magazine in twenty instalments between May 1787 and December 1788. As late as 1840 God’s Revenge against Murder was being published for T. Read with an engraved frontispiece by I. Carwitham and numerous plate representing murders, etc.

Next in popularity to criminal biographies were accounts of wonders, devils, monsters, and ghosts. An auction “catalogue of the choice, curious, and extensive library of the late George Nassau” was published in 1824. Item no 1176 was a pamphlet which bore the extraordinary title The WONDER of Suffolk; Being a TRUE RELATION; Of one that Reports he Made a League with the DEVIL for Three years to do Mischief; And now breaks open houses, robs people daily, destroys Cattel before the owners faces, strips women naked, &c. and can neither be Shot nor Taken; but leaps over walls fifteen foot high, runs five or six miles in a quarter of an hour, and sometimes vanishes in the midst of multitudes that go to take him. The manuscript was “Faithfully written in a Letter from a Sober person, dated not long since, to a friend in Ship yard near Temple Bar, and ready to be attested by hundreds that have been Spectators of, or Sufferers by his Exploits, in several parts of Suffolk, London: Printed for D.M. 1677.”

In 1837-38 London was startled by the appearance of a similar creature, dubbed Steel Jack by the penny-a-liners of the press, “disguised in a bear-skin, and wearing spring-shoes.” Steel Jack would evolve into Spring-Heeled Jack, the name we know him by today. Jack was another aspect of the Devil of folklore as we see in the title of another early tract printed by E. Mallet; A Strange, True, and Dreadful Relation of the Devil’s appearing to Thomas Cox, a Hackney Coach-Man; Who lives in Cradle Alley in Baldwin’s Garden, first in the habit of a Gentleman with a Roll of Parchment in his hand, and then in the shape of a Bear, which afterwards vanish’d away in a flash of Fire, at Eight of the Clock on Friday Night, October 31st, 1694.A pamphlet published about 1838, probably by B.D. Cousins, was titled The Apprehension and Examination of Spring-Heel’d Jack, who has appeared as a Ghost, Demon, Bear, Baboon, etc.

Another form of literature took root in the eighteenth century — criminal anthologies composed of short biographies of highwaymen, pirates, and footpads. The celebrated Captain Alexander Smith wrote The History of the Lives of the most Noted Highway-men, Foot-pads, House-breakers, Shop-lifts, and Cheats, of both Sexes, in and about London, and other Places of Great-Britain, for above Fifty Years last past

The first two volumes were printed for J. Morphew and Sons, near Stationers-Hall, by A. Dodd, without Temple-Bar, in 1714 and a third volume was added in 1720. A historical Captain Alexander Smith has never been traced but the Historical Register mentions one “Captain Alexander Smith try’d for killing Lieutenant Constantine, and found guilty of Manslaughter” on July 15, 1715. In addition, The Spectator announced the wedding of Agnes Smith, the eldest daughter of “the late Captain Alexander Smith, of Limehouse,” in 1838.

Captain Charles Johnson, a rival who pirated portions of Captain Smith’s work, wrote The Lives and Adventures of the most Famous Highwaymen and Pyrates &c. It was published in weekly and monthly parts throughout 1733, and circulated once again in 1734, each number carrying a “Curious Copper Plate.” News-carriers delivered the parts to subscribers who “live out of town.” William Jones wrote An Account of Highwaymen in 1774, and Charles Whitehead’s Lives and Exploits of English Highwaymen appeared in two volumes in 1823. 

For the educated classes, ample criminal material was found in The Newgate Calendar; or Malefactors’ Bloody Register, published about 1774 and running to five volumes. Between 1824 and 1826 Knapp and Baldwin, attorneys-at-law, issued four volumes of The Newgate Calendar comprising interesting memoirs of the most notorious characters, and followed up with six volumes of The New Newgate Calendar.


The most enduring hero of criminal literature stepped into history in 1724. His name would become familiar to the public from newspaper accounts, criminal biographies, chap-books, and, on the stage, in harlequinade and fierce melodrama. That was Jack Sheppard, who was born in 1702 and raised at Bishopsgate Workhouse before apprenticing to a carpenter where he learned to pick locks. The real Jack Sheppard looked longingly into the light from the barred window in the painting by Sir James Thornhill, R. A., painted from life in the condemned hold of Newgate Prison on the 13th of November 1724.[12] 

Sheppard had a large bullet-shaped head on a slight muscular body (he was five foot four) and a boyish face with enormous dark eyes. He was to be hung, at the tender age of twenty-two, not for murder or highway robbery, but for stealing “108 yards of woollen cloth, two silver spoons and other things.” His criminal career lasted eight short months. His posthumous fame rested not on his crimes, which were paltry enough, but on his miraculous escapes, first from St. Giles Round-House, then from Clerkenwell Prison, next the Condemned Hold in Newgate, and finally from the Castle in Newgate Prison. He had even planned an escape from the cart carrying him to Tyburn, and, when foiled, had hopes that his friends would cut him down in time to resuscitate him after the hanging. In this he was mistaken and the young thief was slowly strangled for a quarter of an hour, his light weight putting him to a disadvantage. He showed more courage than his sometime partner Blueskin who was hanged after weeping and trembling and “shewed all the signs of a timorous confusion.”[13]

John Applebee published a 40 page six-pence biography called The True and Genuine Account of the Life and Actions of the late Jonathan Wild; not made up of fiction and fable, but taken from his own mouth, and collected from papers of his own writing in 1725. There was an engraved plate illustrating Wild in the gaol-house and an advertisement at the back of the pamphlet promoting Applebee’s next work, a biography of the celebrated pirate Captain John Gow. Interestingly the first printing of Jonathan Wild appeared on 8 June 1725 and the Captain Gow pamphlet on 11 June, three days later. Both works have been attributed to “Applebee’s man,” Daniel Defoe.[14]

Before me is the accredited version of the hero’s Adventures: — “A Narrative of all the Robberies, Escapes, &c., of John Sheppard: giving an exact description of the manner of his wonderful escape from the CASTLE in Newgate, and of the methods he took afterward for his security. Written by himself during his Confinement in the Middle Stone-room, after his being re-taken in Drury Lane.  To which is prefixed a true Representation of his Escape from the Condemn’d Hold, curiously engraved on a Copper Plate. The whole publish’d at the particular request of the Prisoner. The Third Edition, London: Printed and sold by John Applebee, a little below Bridewell-Bridge, in Black-Fryers, 1724. (Price Six Pence.)” — This pamphlet, somewhat rare, and for which we have paid half-a-crown, is dated “Middle-Stone Room in Newgate, Novem. 10, 1724.[15]

There was something inevitable about Sheppard’s execution. After every marvellous escape Sheppard, instead of fleeing London, was drawn back to his old haunts like a moth to the flame. He was “oftentimes in Spittle-fields, Drury-lane, Lewkenor’s-lane, Parkers-lane, St. Thomas-Street, &c.” In A Narrative Sheppard recalls walking in the Hay-market where he “mixt with a Crowd about two Ballad-Singers; the Subject being about Sheppard. And I remember the Company was very merry about the Matter.” 

The penny dreadful illustrator Robert Prowse drew a woodcut of Sheppard joining a street crowd to buy an Account of his escape from Newgate for Blueskin: A Romance of the Last Century.[xvi] Jack Sheppard was also the hero of the earliest Newgate stage drama on record, The Prison-breaker, or the Adventures of John Shepherd, of 1725, a farce “intended to be acted at the Theatre Royal, Lincoln’s Inn Field.”[17]

Daniel Defoe had published several criminal novels: The King of Pirates in 1719, The Life, Adventures, and Piracies of Captain Singleton in 1720, The Fortunes and Misfortunes of Moll Flanders in 1721, The History of the most remarkable Life and extraordinary Adventures of Colonel Jacque, vulgarly called Colonel Jack in 1722 and The Fortunate Mistress (Roxana) in 1724. William Hazlitt compared Defoe’s realism in Colonel Jack to Henry Fielding’s “most amusing but imaginary being, whom we have never met with” — the fictional Jonathan Wild.[18]

In like manner, ‘Colonel Jack’ is a common thief; one of the multitudes that infest the streets of the metropolis, and every session sees him hung at Tyburn. But ‘Jonathan Wild’ is a compound of elaborate villainy, whom nature never made; the materials, indeed, she furnished, but the workmanship is Fielding’s, and his alone. An acquaintance with one or two of the tribe, a slight study of the ‘Newgate Calendar,’ or an occasional visit to the office in Bow street, would suffice to enable the inventive genius of Defoe to delineate the features of an ordinary pickpocket; but the rogue of Fielding is the production of one who has made villainy his study and contemplated it in every possible variety.[19]

César de Saussure, a French visitor to London in 1726, noticed that “all Englishmen are great newsmongers. Workmen habitually begin the day by going to coffee-rooms to read the latest news. I have often seen shoe-blacks and other persons of that class club together to buy a paper. Nothing is more entertaining than hearing men of this class discussing politics and news about royalty.”[20]  

Already newspapers covered the sensational criminal cases of the day. The Daily Gazetteer, August 5, 1735, reported that “Joseph Emerson, the noted Highway-man and Horse-stealer, was removed by a habeas corpus from Worcester Jail to the New Jail in Southwark, in order to take his Trial at the ensuing Assizes for Surry, for several Robberies committed in that County.”

John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera (1728) was the foremost Newgate literature of the eighteenth century. His first play, The Mohocks, was acted at Covent Garden in 1712. The Beggar’s Opera was acted at Lincoln’s Inn Fields in 1728.

The novelist Henry Fielding set up a theatrical booth at Bartholomew Fair in 1725 and his production of The Beggar’s Opera was played there in George Yard in 1728.[21] William Howitt noticed the influence of the play on cheap literature in 1846 — “(…) the songs of The Beggar’s Opera have begun again to be sung, and a manifest tendency has been produced to exalt into this admiration of the multitude, highwaymen and women of the town. Neither can it be denied that it has given birth anew, in the shape of novels, to Newgate literature.”[22]

The word “hack” was in use from at least 1731 when The Gentleman’s Magazine described the semi-literate writing of a “Grubstreet hackney.” Daniel Defoe used the phrase “hackney author,” a word derived from hackney coach. The derogatory term denoted one in harness and was eventually shortened to “hack.” One resourceful hack told his story in a letter to The Connoisseur in 1755, signed “Orator Higgins.”

I was next promoted to the garret of a printer of bloody murders, where my business was to invent terrible stories, write Yorkshire tragedies, or Christmas carrols, and occasionally to put the Ordinary of Newgate’s Account of Dying Speeches into lamentable rhyme. I was afterwards concerned in works that required a greater fund of erudition, such as bog-house miscellanies, and little books for children; and I was once engaged as the principal compiler of a two-penny magazine. Since that I followed the occupation of an Eves-dropper, or Collector of News for the daily papers; in which I turned a good penny by hunting after marriages and deaths, and inventing lyes for the day. Once indeed, being out of other business, I descended to the mean office of a ballad-singer, and hawked my own verses; but not having a good ear for music, and the tone of my voice being rather inclined to whining, I converted my ballads into penitential hymns, and took up the vocation of Methodist Preacher.

One impecunious wretch who turned his hand to last dying speeches was poor Jack Funnel (possibly a fictional being), who became an author in 1707, and described his lifestyle in 1732.

My first Appearance as an Author, says Jack, was in a horrid, barbarous, and bloody Murder. The Profits of that was just enough to turn me a Coat and mend my Shoes. The next was a strange and surprising Appearance of the Murder’d Person’s Apparition. This fetched my Waistcoat out of Pawn and payed my Laundry Woman. By writing accounts of Monstrous Fish, Last Dying Speeches, Robberies, Earthquakes and Blazing Stars, Last Wills and Testaments, Interpretations of Dreams, High-Winds, and Dreadful Fires, I keep my Cloaths in Repair, pay my Barber, Alehouse Scores, and Landlady, and buy Firing Pipes and Tobacco. When my Works go stale, I vamp them with a new Title Page; ransack old Novels and pals them for Secret History and Court Intrigues. Now and then I make a Song or an Ode, and am paid for letting others father it. With these and other Auxiliaries, as Epitaphs, Elegies, Epithalamiums, Ballads, Bellman’s verses, &c. I make a Shift to pick up a Livelihood; but am much chagrin’d to see writers of worse Parts supported in Ease and Affluence.[23]

At the same time Jack Funnel was lamenting his lot in life William Hogarth, the painter, published six prints by subscription in April 1732 titled The Harlot’s Progress, the first of Hogarth’s ‘Modern Moral Subjects.’ The prints sold by subscription for one guinea. The purchaser was supplied with a bonus in the shape of an illustrated ticket. Hogarth’s famous pictorial novels had a tremendous effect on the emergent novel, the drama, book illustration, single and sequential caricature, and even social reform.

The familiarity of the subject and the propriety of the execution made it tasted by all people. Every engraver let himself to copy it, and thousands of imitations were dispersed all over the kingdom. It was made into a Pantomime and performed on the stage.[24]

The public’s appetite for crime showed no signs of abating. By 1733 a theatrical critic lamented that “Genteel Comedy has now left the Stage, as well as the nobler Tragic Muse; and all our Heroes and Heroines of the Drama have been fetched from Newgate and Bridewell.”

But now the horrid Pantomime, and wicked Dumb Shew, the famous Harlequin-Mimickery, introduced only to shew how to cozen, to cheat, deceive and cuckold; together with the wretched Group of Rogues formed from the characters of Sheppard, Jonathan Wild, Blueskin and others, remarkable for their superlative Wickedness, are exhibited, not for the sake of Poetical Justice in their Execution, but to divert the Audience by their Tricks and Escapes.[25]

The famed highwayman Dick Turpin was “turned-off,” along with one John Stead, both for horse-stealing, on April 7, 1739. Turpin spoke a few parting words then launched himself into eternity, expiring in five minutes. “The Mob having got Scent that his Body was stole away to be anatomiz’d, went to the Place, and brought it away almost naked on Mens Shoulders, and filling the Coffin with Lime, buried it in the same Grave.”[26] The bodies of the condemned were usually conveyed to Surgeon’s Hall for dissection. The publisher’s Ward and Chandler supplied The Tryal of Richard Turpin, a criminal biography, for 6d.

A favourite of the Newgate Calendars, later resurrected for the penny bloods, was the pick-pocket Jenny Diver, also known as Mrs. Jane Jones, real name Mary Young, who was hanged at Tyburn on March 18, 1740. It was a shocking spectacle with over twenty persons publicly strangled in one day. During the commission of her crimes Jenny pretended pregnancy by wearing a false belly which she would fill with booty. She was twice transported and in her final captivity was kept in style at Newgate by her many admirers.

She appeared gaily dressed until the last, yet deeply affected by her approaching Fate. Her Concern was so sensibly expressed, when she took Leave of her little Child, a few days before her Execution, that (a weekly Writer says) it drew Tears into the Eyes of the Turnkey.[27]

A two-volume publication called The Adventures of William Bradshaw Commonly Stiled Devil Dick was issued in 1754. The publisher was Crowder and Woodgate, and the price was 9s. The Monthly Review’s notice was blunt, the “author must, certainly, be deeply read in the Newgate memoirs, and Tyburn history, a collection of these he has jumbled together, and published, to plague us, in the form of DEVIL DICK.” A work of 1824 says “None of our diurnal novelists or biographers have yet given us any real or imaginary memoirs of chimney-sweepers. But they have given us the lives of persons who, in the eyes of reason, were of a much lower rank. Devil Dick was, in the strictest propriety of speech, of a much blacker, and consequently a meaner character than any chimney-sweeper.”[28] 

It was remembered as a notorious book. Francis Place described the contents as consisting of “lying, cheating, robbery and debauchery.”[29] Another title noticed by the Monthly Review was The Adventures of Dick Hazard, “a history of the gaming table and its consequences,” whose chief merit was “that it exceeds not one volume.” The reviewer complained that it was necessary to read every publication printed, “submit to the whole drudgery of going through those loads of trash which are thrown upon us under the denomination of Lives, Adventures, Memoirs, Histories &c.”[30]

Sixteen String Jack, who wore breeches with eight strings at each knee, was a pickpocket turned highwayman. His Life was titled A Genuine Account of the Life of Jack Rann, Alias Sixteen-String Jack: Who was executed November 30th, 1774, for a Robbery on the Highway, near Brentford. Containing his Adventures and Enterprises, his numerous Escapes from Justice, and his Amours with several Ladies. Among which is introduced Some Curious Anecdotes of Miss Smith and Miss Roche, his favorite Dulcineas. To which there is added Some Strictures on the Penal Laws, and a particular Account of Lane and Trotman, now under sentence of Death for the Barbarous Robbery of Mr. Floyd, in a Coach, near Chelsea, printed by Bailey in 1774. Coloured portrait etchings of Sixteen-String Jack, together with Miss Roche, were produced and sold to the public. 

Another biography was The Genuine life of Jack Rann, otherwise Sixteen-strings Jack; Who is now under Sentence of Death for Robbing Dr. William Bell, Chaplain to R.H. the Princess Amelia. Containing a great number of interesting details of which it highly concerns the public to be informed. Together with Anecdotes of Miss Roche, and several other Persons connected with Rann, issued by E. Johnson, 1774. This one had a frontispiece portrait of Rann. In 1823 The life of Jack Rann: otherwise Sixteen-String Jack, the noted Highwayman: who was executed at Tyburn, November 30, 1774 was published as a chap-book by Hodgson and Co. with a hand-coloured frontispiece believed to be by Robert Cruikshank.

A Summary Account of the Life, Trial and Confession of John the Painter alias James Hill. Alias James Hind, alias James Actzen, alias James Aitken, tried at Winchester Assize, March 6, 1877, for setting fire to the Rope-House in Portsmouth Dock-Yard, December 7, 1776, and who was executed March 10, 1777 (With an accurate Likeness) was published under the masthead of The London Magazine in March 1777. This was a five-page magazine reprint of the officially sanctioned Trial, which had been published by permission of the Judges. James Hill, deserter, rapist, and thief was able to order his own Confessions printed up but it was said they differed in many particulars from the facts. A notice in the Monthly Review was admiring. “There was something so very extraordinary in the story of this wretch, and his desperate undertakings, that his trial (…) will in course, be perused, as a matter of singular curiosity, in its kind.”

Devil Dick publisher Crowder was still publishing in 1778 when he issued The Trial of James Boulter and James Caldwell, the two noted Flying Highwaymen, who have, for some time past, committed numerous Highway robberies in all parts of this Kingdom at 6d. At the back of the pamphlet was an advertisement for the Life of Boulter, a separate publication. James Boulter came from a thieving stock, his father had been transported and his uncle convicted for highway robbery. The speed with which he rode from place to place on his dashing steed earned him the sobriquet of the Flying Highwayman.

There was another type of criminal literature that sprang up about this time, strangers’ guides to London, which warned the country bumpkins, known as “flats” against the cons, tricks, and depredations of the sophisticated London “sharps.” The criminals had their own street-language known as Pedlar’s French or St. Giles Greek which was later adopted by the pugilistic “Fancy,” the Corinthians of Pierce Egan’s day. Flash language was common to France and Spain before migrating to England about the middle half of the sixteenth century.

As this expressive language was originally invented, and is still used, like the cipher of the diplomatists, for purposes of secrecy, and as a means of eluding the vigilance of a certain class of persons, called flashicè, Traps, or in common language Bow-street-Officers, it is subject of course to continual change, and is perpetually either altering the meaning of old words, or adding new ones, according as the great object, secrecy, renders it prudent to have recourse to such innovations.[31]

One of the earliest strangers’ guides, with something for every interest, was called Blackguardiana: or, A Dictionary of Rogues, Bawds, Pimps, Whores, Pickpockets, Shoplifters, Mail-robbers, Coiners, House-breakers, Murderers, Pirates, Gipsies, Mountebanks, &c., &c. Illustrated with eighteen portraits of the most remarkable professors in every species of villainy. Interspersed with many curious Anecdotes, Cant Terms, Flash Songs, &c., the whole Intended to put Society on their guard against Depredators; and was picked up by an Inhabitant of St. James's, who was a Spectator of a grand Scuffle, on a Birth-day night. Copied for the inspection of the Curious; and the Original ready to be returned (on describing the binding, &c.) to the loser, published by James Caulfield in 1793, printed for J. Shepherd.

Popular gothic novels, issued in three or four expensive volumes, were abridged, and stuffed into 36 pages at sixpence, sometimes 72 pages for a shilling, by the cheap press of Thomas Tegg and others. These popular piracies, linear descendants of chap books, were designated “bluebooks” for their flimsy blue covers. Most issues were given startling new titles but occasionally original titles like Fatherless Fanny or The Old English Baron were retained. Thousands of volumes of these little gothic bluebooks, with engraved frontispieces and catchpenny titles such as The Secret Oath; or, The Blood-stained Dagger, a Romance (1802), were published between 1799 and 1820. Several monthly magazines, The Marvellous Magazine, The Tell-Tale, and Radcliffe’s New Novelist’s Pocket Magazine published these compressed gothics as well. 

In 1881 Charles Henry Ross revived the bluebooks method in C. H. Ross’s Penny Library. For one penny, the buyer received a “cut and paste” version of popular works in 32-page pocket books. Titles included The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Confessions of Harry Lorrequor, The Mysteries of Paris and Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens. Charles Dickens junior lambasted the productions, “of which the scissors of Charles H. Ross have been called into requisition,” in Household Words.

To publish a garbled version of a novel, and to let it go forth to the public with a title-page calling it “The Story of Oliver Twist, by Charles Dickens,” is nothing more or less than fraud. It should be enough for the publisher that he is able to lay hands on a story, owing to the expiration of the ridiculously short period of copyright with which the English Parliament rewards literary men. But, if we must have this sort of thing at all, the book ought at least to be honestly announced as “Oliver Twist, abridged by Charles H. Ross from the novel by Charles Dickens.”[32]

Henry Fielding, author of The History of the Life of the Late Mr Jonathan Wild the Great, was the first to publish crime news and advertisements for wanted felons and Navy deserters in a newspaper called The Public Advertiser. In 1786 the Bow Street magistrates, under Henry’s brother John Fielding, (known as “the blind beak,”) converted a weekly posted crime bulletin into a newspaper called the Public Hue and Cry. The Public Hue and Cry was later renamed The Hue and Cry and Police Gazette, under the printer T. Wright, then, in 1828 transformed into the Police Gazette, selling weekly 30,000. In 1828 new printing machines were purchased which could throw off 4000 impressions an hour, thus speeding the spreading of criminal alarms.[33]

Therefore, if the information of robberies, murders, horse-stealing, &c., were printed off every night, the Hue and Cry could be delivered with all the papers to taverns, public houses, pawnbrokers, horse dealers, and hung up in all the coach offices in London, and also be distributed by the mails to the post offices of the principal places in the country; the paper is not very large, and would be considerably reduced if the above plan were pursued.[34]

In the year 1802, “when immorality had spread all over Europe, owing to the demoralizing effects of the French Revolution,” The Society for the Suppression of Vice was formed. The objects to which the attention of the Society was directed were prevention of the profanation of the Lord’s day, blasphemous publications, obscene books, prints, etc., disorderly houses and fortune-tellers. The Seditious Publications Act was enacted in 1820, introducing a tax of fourpence on periodicals containing “news.” Utilitarian’s called it a “tax on knowledge.” Reading, writing, and self-improvement became part of the working-class struggle.

The radical publisher William Hone published several expensive criminal biographies and trials, in boards, in 1821. One, from a page advertising Works Published by William Hone, was The Trial of Eliz. Fenning, Charged with Administering Poison with Intent to Murder and the other was a follow-up, The Mysterious Case of Elizabeth Fenning, which was written after her execution. Hone sold celebrity portraits as well as his scabrous political caricatures and tracts; portraits of Byron, Napoleon and Elizabeth Fenning. 

The most interesting portrait was that of William Norris, the Insane American, “riveted alive in iron” and confined in a cell at Bethlem “as he was seen there in 1815 by W. Hone and etched by Cruikshank.” George Cruikshank did a steady business in portraits of criminals, participants in trials for Crim. Con etc., for the publisher Fairburn. In his own library was a pamphlet entitled Bedworth (Thomas) Trial for Murder of Elizabeth Beesmore published in 1815. On the folding frontispiece, Cruikshank had written “Drawn and etched in two hours by Geo. Cruikshank.”

The Terrific Register; or, Record of Crimes, Judgements, Providences, and Calamities was taken in weekly numbers by precocious thirteen-year-old Charles Dickens in 1825. G.A. Sala said of Dickens that he liked to discuss “the latest new piece at the theatres, the latest exciting trial or police case, the latest social craze or social swindle, and especially the latest murder and the newest thing in ghosts.”[35] 

The Terrific Register had its origins in John Reynolds serially published 1656 work, God’s Revenge Against Murder. An illustration of a skeletal hand turning the pages of an open book with the title God’s Revenge Against Murder featured prominently on the volume covers of The Terrific Register. The contents revolved around tales of crime, murder, execution, torture, freaks of nature and disasters. Titles illustrated by ghastly engravings included Sawney Beane the Monster of Scotland and Horrible Murder of a Child.

The most celebrated criminal of 1824 was John Thurtell, who lured William Weare to Gill’s Hill Cottage, owned by William Probert, shot him once, beat his brains in with a pistol, then slit his throat. All this over a 300-pound debt. The body was weighted with stones and thrown into a pond. Thurtell and his two accomplices, Probert and Joseph Hunt, were taken in custody by the capable and celebrated Bow-street runner Thomas Joseph Ruthven and confined in St. Alban’s gaol. Thomas Abel Ward, a Watford surgeon, described the horrible injuries to the body of William Weare.

Part of the skull was beaten into the brains. There was another wound under the protuberance of the right cheek-bone, which had the appearance of a common gun or pistol-shot wound, and the ball repelled by the cheek-bone. I am of the opinion that the wound on the right cheek was not of a nature to cause death; but that the deceased died from the beating on the skull with the pistol barrel. The injury was of that nature, that I conceive the pistol barrel must have been punched with desperate violence into the skull of the unfortunate man. — [Witness here produced a piece of deceased’s skull bone, which he had extracted from the brains of the deceased on opening the head.] I also observed a wound cut by a sharp instrument on each side of the throat; the jugular on the left side was divided, and the wound was sufficient to occasion death. The wound on the right side of the throat did not injure any parts of vitality, but merely severed the flesh under the ear.” Coroner: It seems that after the deceased was shot, he was able to struggle with his murderer, and that he received the blows on the head when resisting, and to make sure, as “dead men tell no tales,” his murderers completed their horrid work by cutting his throat.

In 1824 Thomas Kelly of Paternoster-row published The Fatal Effects of Gambling exemplified in the Murder of William Weare, and the Trial and fate of John Thurtell, the Murderer, and his Accomplices; with Biographical Sketches of the Parties Concerned, and a Comment on the Extraordinary Circumstances developed in the Narrative, in which Gambling is proved to be the source of Forgery, Robbery, Murder, and General Demoralization. To which is added, the Gambler’s Scourge; a Complete Expose of the Whole System of Gambling in the Metropolis; with Memoirs and Anecdotes of Notorious Blacklegs. This was illustrated by Portraits Drawn from Life, and other Copper-plate Engravings of Peculiar Interest. “Weare, Thurtell, Hunt and Probert,” the author relates, “were all sporting blades, ultra-flash men, and gamblers — preying alike upon each other, and upon society in general.” John Thurtell was an amateur pugilist.

(…) Hickman, the notorious fighting gasman was in training for one of his pitched battles, at Wade’s Mill, in Hertfordshire, Thurtell, in company with one Elliot, of sporting notoriety, spent a good deal both of time and money with him. The fate of these three men is at once singular and awful. In less than thirteen months, Elliot died by his own hand; Hickman, returning from a prize-fight, in a state of intoxication, was thrown from a chaise, and his head literally crushed to atoms — and Thurtell died by the hands of the common hangman for a cold-blooded and deliberate murder.

One of the mourners at Hickman’s funeral was the journalist Pierce Egan. An extraordinary feature of the trial was the defence delivered in person by John Thurtell, in which he read out “in a firm and distinct voice, and in a most impressive manner,” the whole contents of seven cases on wrongful convictions based on circumstantial evidence, from the Percy Anecdotes and the Newgate Calendar (possibly this was read from a recent Thomas Kelly publication of Theodore Wilkinson’s New Newgate Calendar Improved.) His protestation of innocence was of no avail, Thurtell was sentenced to death, and following a bow to a friend and a few final words with the governor of the gaol, he was hung. His body was removed to the Theatre of Anatomy where it remained on public view for three or four days. “Among the persons who availed themselves of this opportunity of viewing the remains of Thurtell, were about twenty persons belonging to the establishment of Mr. Kelly, the publisher of this work; with whom an eminent artist attended for the purpose of verifying to the extremest possible point of fidelity our portrait of the great criminal.” 

William Probert turned King’s Evidence and got off scot-free. Joseph Hunt was also sentenced to be hanged, fortunately for him this was commuted to transportation for life. One enterprising rogue went about London and environs exhibiting the purported head of Thurtell. “The flesh of the face was removed, probably to prevent detection by anyone who might chance to know Thurtell; the hair, ears, and teeth were still attached to the skull.”

Another of Thurtell’s biographers was Pierce Egan, the famous author of Life in London: or, the Day and Night Scenes of Jerry Hawthorn, Esq., and his Elegant Friend Corinthian Tom, accompanied by Bob Logic, the Oxonian, in their Rambles and Sprees through the Metropolis, first issued in July 1821 in shilling numbers. Life in London introduced the characters of Tom and Jerry into popular culture. Corinthian Tom takes his country cousin, Jerry, on an illustrated tour of London gin houses, monkey and dog fights, street brawls, the Bow Street Police Court and finally to prison. 

The book was illustrated by Isaac Robert and George Cruikshank, sons of a Scottish artist who had settled in London. The first of many stage versions produced in London was a musical farce called Tom and Jerry; or, Life in London, dramatized by William T. Moncrieff. There were many sequels including Tom and Jerry in Paris, Nautical Tom and Jerry, and Tom and Jerry in New York. Another of Egan’s books, The Life of an Actor, was staged at the Adelphi Theatre on January 11, 1825.

Life in London inspired The English Spy, an illustrated book by notorious blackmailer, slanderer, and libeller Bernard Blackmantle (Charles Molloy Westmacott), illustrated by Isaac Robert Cruikshank. The illustrations in the original were colour copperplate aquatint etchings, all by Robert Cruikshank, excepting one plate contributed by the aging caricaturist Thomas Rowlandson.

The scenes were placed in real taverns, gambling hells, and London landmarks. Included were caricatures representing many of the famous men and women of the day from high and low society, such as Madame Vestris, Charles Kemble and Townshend the Bow Street Runner. Blackmantle and Robert Cruikshank (known as “Bob Transit” in the text) were depicted in most plates. Robert Cruikshank himself claimed (in Finish to the Adventures of Tom, Jerry, and Logic in their pursuits through Life in and out of London) that Life in London was a book originated by himself and not Egan. The vicious pastimes of the Mohocks were revived that same year, 1821, when Pierce Egan published his celebrated Life in London.

At that time the well-known farce of “Tom and Jerry” became the vogue in London; and, in imitation of the freaks of its personages, hundreds of young men enrolled themselves under the banners of the Mohocks and sallied forth at midnight in search of adventures. The prime achievement of that day was “boxing the Charlies,” — by which name we are to understand the watchmen, — and it was accounted the very acmeé of spirit, the height of gallantry and bravery among some young men, to carry off a watchman, and deposit, him box and all, in a neighbouring horse-pond. Of late years, however, headed by two aristocratic leaders, they have re-appeared in all their pristine splendour. Around them they have rallied honourables and right-honourables, barons, baronets, and knights, with no inconsiderable number of shop-men and apprentices, who make it their glory to resemble in their defects, those above them in their station. They principally confine their operations to one quarter of the town, occasionally sallying forth to the villages in the neighbourhood of London upon expeditions of mischief.[36]

Egan was a master printer, and self-described “scribbler,” held in high esteem by the sporting crowd for Boxiana: Sketches of Antient and Modern Pugilism by “One of the Fancy.” The first volume was published in parts by G. Smeeton in 1812 and the last series ended in 1829. Pierce Egan launched a newspaper (“For King and Country”) on February 1, 1824 called Pierce Egan’s Life in London and Sporting Guide. By 1826 Pierce Egan’s newspaper was in trouble and on December 19, 1827 was incorporated with Bell’s Life in London which began giving out inserted sheets of Cruikshank’s comicalities with each number, beginning the following week. In Pierce Egan’s role of a penny-a-liner he covered boxing and sports for other newspapers than his own, among them Bell’s Weekly Messenger. Egan’s wife Catherine also contributed to Bell’s Weekly.

American author Otto Dix described Egan when he was near seventy years of age, when he was still eking out a living by his pen, “(…) feeble and shaky, as might be expected but there was a sort of jauntiness about the old gentleman still, his grey eye was quick and vivacious, and his brown wig had the old sporting “cock,” the eyebrows were large, the nose a little hooked, and the lower lip so projected as to give a rather severe expression to his countenance. The old boy was wrapped in a large camlet cloak with a red collar, and he hobbled with a stick.”[37]

Knight and Lacey, publishers at 24 Paternoster-row, provided Pierce Egan’s Account of the Trial of John Thurtell and Joseph Hunt, With an Appendix, Disclosing some Extraordinary Facts, Exclusively in Possession of the Editor with Portraits and other Illustrative Engravings. This was a straightforward account of the trials of Thurtell, Hunt and Probert taken verbatim from Pierce Egan’s Life in London newspaper columns. It was not half as entertaining or absorbing as The Fatal Effects of Gambling exemplified in the Murder of William Weare. However, the Appendix with its promised anecdotes was missing from the copy I consulted. The Appendix would have proved an interesting read because Pierce Egan happened know Thurtell personally, and interviewed him in prison. The Account carried only one illustration showing the heads of the murderous trio of blackguards. Mason Jackson, in The Pictorial Press, its Origin and Progress, 1885, pointed out the close relationship between criminals and their biographers.

In those days’ prize-fighting was in much favour, and a great fight was coming off between Spring and Langham, two noted pugilists. To show the ruffian and impenitent character of Thurtell, it is related that he said, a few hours before his execution, “It is perhaps wrong in my situation; but I own I should like to read Pierce Egan’s account of the great fight yesterday.”

The Fatal Effects of Gambling gives Hunt’s account of the last moments of Thurtell with a slightly different version of events.

After we had taken the sacrament, and about a quarter of an hour before he went out to suffer, Thurtell said to Mr. Wilson, ‘I have one more favour to request of you, if you can oblige me.’ Mr. Wilson asked what it was? Thurtell said, ‘It is to tell me how the great fight terminated?’ Mr. W. said he did not know, but he would go out and inquire; he did so, and on his return, he said, ‘It has been a hard-fought battle, it lasted for two hours and five minutes, and Spring was a great deal punished, but he has won it.’ On which Thurtell said, ‘I am glad of it; God bless him, he is an old friend of mine.

Pierce Egan’s Life in London newspaper for February 1, 1824 featured the following advertisement.

THURTELL’S HEAD. Special permission having been given to the Editor of the Medical Adviser to examine the body of Thurtell immediately after the Execution, the PECULIAR CRANIOLOGICAL appearances on his Head will be fully described in No. 7, accompanied by illustrative engravings, including a correct likeness of Thurtell taken after his decease.

The Medical Adviser was published by Knight and Lacey who also published Pierce Egan’s Account of the Trial of John Thurtell and Joseph Hunt. It must have been a curious magazine. The editor of the Medical Advisor, accompanied by publisher Kelly’s representatives and several phrenologists (a ‘science’ sneered at in Fatal Effects of Gambling) examined the body of Thurtell after the execution.

The visitors of each succeeding day were witnesses of the gradual dilapidation, if not the decay, of the body. On one day a finger, on another an eye, was missing; and as the surgeons, in the intervals of their admission of the public proceeded with their work, the body progressively presented such appearances as to render it both a matter of prudence and of public decency finally to close the door against further admission.[38]



PREVIOUS: 

Thieves’ Literature: Three centuries of Penny Bloods, Sensational Literature & Popular Melodrama — an Introduction HERE





NOTES

[1] The Mary Carleton Narratives, 1663-1673, a Missing Chapter in the History of the English Novel, Ernest Bernbaum, 1915

[2] The Ordinary of Newgate and His Account, Crime in England 1550-1800, P. Linebaugh, p.247

[3] From 1698 to 1719 the Ordinary of Newgate was Paul Lorrain. His confessions were issued at eight oclock on the morning of executions.

[4] The New Newgate Calendar: or, Malefactor's Bloody Register, London: Alexander Hogg, c. 1773, p.256

[5] Bibliotheca Spenceriana, 1822, p.36

[6] The Highway-Woman

[7] The Plays of William Shakespeare, p. 173

[8] Portraits, Memoirs, and Characters, of Remarkable Persons, James Caulfield, 1813

[9] The Collected Writings of Thomas De Quincey. Vol. XIII, Tales and Prose Phantasies. By David Masson. London: A. & C. Black, Soho Square, 1897. Murder as one of the Fine Arts footnote page 56.

[10] The Shakespeare Folios, American Bibliopolist, June and July, 1870, p.180

[11] Arnold's Magazine of the Fine Arts Vol. 3, 1832. p.379

[12] Thornhills painting was reproduced as an etching and sold to the public through print-sellers. Jonathan Wilds Portrait in Newgate was another popular etching of the time. Sir James Thornhill was purportedly accompanied by William Hogarth and James Fig, first bareknuckle champion of England, when he drew the celebrated portrait of Jack Sheppard in the condemned cell. It has been suggested that Daniel Defoe interrogated Sheppard in prison, resulting in the pamphlet titled A Narrative of all the Robberies, Escapes, &c., of John Sheppard.

[13] History of the Lives and Actions of Jonathan Wild, Thief-taker, Joseph Blake , alias Blueskin, Footpad, and John Sheppard , Housebreaker, 1750

[14] The attribution remains contentious. According to Defoe De-Attributions: Critique of J.R. Moore's Checklist (1994), there is no evidence that Defoe wrote for Applebee.

[15] Jack Sheppard, The Literary World, Vol. 2 No. 32, 2 Nov 1839, p.66. The first Applebee edition was published 19 Oct 1724, the second 26 Oct 1724, the third 12 Nov 1724.

[16] Blueskin: A Romance of the Last Century, London: E. Harrison, 1863, Vol. 1, No. 35, p.273

[17] The Companion to the Play-House, David Erskine Baker, 1764

[18] The History of the Life of Mr. Jonathan Wild the Great, Henry Fielding, 1743

[19] The Works of Daniel Defoe, with a memoir of his life and writings, William Hazlitt, London: John Clements, 1840, Vol. I, p.cl

[20] A Foreign View of England in the Reigns of George I & George II, César de Saussure., 1902

[21] The Old Showmen, and the Old London Fairs, Thomas Frost, 1874, p. 104

[22] Homes and Haunts of the Most Eminent British Poets, William Howitt, 1849, p.143

[23] The Gentlemans Magazine or Monthly Intelligencer, Vol. II, April 1732, p. 713

[24] Memoirs of the Celebrated William Hogarth, The Universal Magazine, Nov 1780, p.225

[25] Weekly Miscellany No. 52, 8 Dec 1773

[26] Gentlemans Magazine, April, 1739, p.7

[27] The Gentlemans Magazine, Vol. XI. March 1741, p.100

[28] A Biographical History of England from Egbert the Great to the Revolution, Rev. J. Granger, 1824, p.174

[29] Francis Place quote from Victorian Prelude, Maurice James Quinlan, 1904

[30] The Monthly Review, Vol. XI, 1754, p.470

[31] Tom Crib's Memorial to Congress, Thomas Moore, Third Edition, 1819, Preface, p. xxvii

[32] The Editors Note Book, Household Words, Vol. 2, 1881, p.450

[33] Introduction, Patrick Pringle, Memoirs of a Bow Street Runner, Henry Goddard, Museum Press, 1956

[34] The Tocsin; or a Review of the London Police Establishments, with Hints for their Improvement and for the Prevention of Calamitous Fires &c., 1828, p.23

[35] Things That I Have Seen, G. A. Sala, Vol. I, 76.

[36] Ancient and Modern Mohocks, Charles Mackay, Bentleys Miscellany, Vol. VI, 1839, p. 357

[37] Lions: living and dead; or, Personal Recollections of the Great and Gifted, John Ross Dix, aka John Dix Ross and John Ross, London: Partridge and Oakey, 1852, p.289

[38] The Fatal Effects of Gambling Exemplified in the Murder of William Weare, 1824, P.333